hEightsblog VIII

 The revolution is aimed at new arrangements, while the insurrection leads us to no longer let ourselves be arranged. It instead seeks to arrange ourselves, and set no radiant hopes on any institutions. Permanent revolutions are good because they change things in a manner where revoltions don’t take people by surprise since they are ongoing.  It is not a fight versus the establishment, since, if this prospers, the establishment would collapse of itself.  It is only a working of a person’s way out of the establishment. If they leave the establishment, it is dead and falls into decay. Since now their aim would not be the overthrow of the established order but their rising up above it, their intention and action would not be a political or social intention and action, but, since they are directed really toward themselves and their ownness, an egoistic intention and action The revolution demands that a person makes arrangements; the insurrection demands that a person stand or...

 I believe that the New England states should have seceded from the Union during the War of 1812 thus forming their own county and helped or took over for the British in that war against the US. Once that happened and New England won the War of 1812 vs the US (and Britain left the US),   I'd want New England to force the South, Midwest, West and non New England Northeast US to be as liberal as New England. It's just that I feel that the US wasn't doing enough to help New England during that war and that New England could have had an opening in seceding and defeating the US to spread liberal New England puritan values throughout the US to make the US more liberal decades earlier and be ahead of the curve hence my support for a 1812 New England secession from the Union and them forming their own country. I support the United States breaking free of British rule in the 1770s, and fighting for and gaining their independence from Britain. I support the formation of the United ...

 

  American model Likes   George Washington   Abraham   Lincoln   Guns   Freedom & Liberty   (Self-proclaimed)   Liberal Democracy   Manifest Destiny   NATO   Military Interventions

  Burdenist Hannah Ardent approved (alter) Chauvinism / LOM Lef t W i ng Ch auv i n i sm  (not unlike    Western Chauvinist Leftism [7] ) A subaltern view - Frontline - The Hindu The Hindu https://frontline.thehindu.com  › Books Aug 7, 2013 —  He calls this “ statist chauvinism ”. Pandey's close reading of the available sources is a useful lesson in research methodology as he sifts ...

 Cultural invisible coup (NON  literal coup /NON violent) means a legally and democratically elected head of state makes such radical and extreme changes (but popular with about most or near most of the country) to the country after taking over as head of state it feels like a coup due to these new radical extreme cultural policies causing such changes in our country it feels like our country is one we no longer recognize 

When Whites are no longer in the majority, racism will fade and the US will never be a White country again These Census figures appear to validate a typical assumption: That the US is heading forward to become a rainbow nation around the mid 2040s, when Whites are predicted to become a minority. So the dewhitening of the US will lead to the erosion of anti blackness, ethnic/racial chauvinism, white supremacy etc This reddit thread  backs me up here and refutes counter arguments listed in its OP