hEightsblog VIII

 Legality wise, I feel that the US should consider making all illegals who have lived in the US and contribute in some way to our society for at least a few years (give or take a year or two), and basically integrated “de facto legal by default” (but without publicly making such a virtue signaling proclamation, only through actions not words) This way , there would be less bickering and divisiveness over this issue since that would be a stealth way to extremely decrease illegals in the US without deporting them or creating harsh anti immigration policies (but different than former President Ronald Reagan did it with his 1986 IRCA, in part because this wouldn’t be amnesty but a fundamental change to permanently blur or even remove the lines between legal and ‘illegal’ immigrant while retro fitting current illegals into this change by making them ‘de facto legal by default’).  Can’t complain about ‘illegal’ immigrants if there is hardly a line between legal and illegal immigrant...

  “Every journalist covering Ukraine should really, really look internally. This is why I say we should stop pretending we have objectivity and in instead acknowledge our biases so that we can report against them,” she wrote. “Many of us see the racialized analysis and language.” “Every journalist covering Ukraine should really, really look internally. This is why I say we should stop pretending we have objectivity and in instead acknowledge our biases so that we can report against them. Many of us see the racialized analysis and language. https://t.co/Q0bmQzqja4 — Ida Bae Wells (@nhannahjones) February 27, 2022 She added, “And honestly, these admissions of shock that this is happening in a European country are ahistorical and also serve to justify the lack of sympathy for other invasions, other occupations and other refugee crisis involving peoples not considered white.” And honestly, these admissions of shock that this is happening in a European country are ahistorical and also s...

 Someone once said to you – I think it was Kronawetter –: “Anti-Semitism is the socialism of the dumb guy.” That might be a neat thought but it is not accurate at all. The true supporters of anti-Semitism, the small business- and landowners are not wrong, from theirpoint of view. To them, capital mostly appears in the shape of the Jew.  From August Bebel (one of the founders of the German Social Democracy)  “In Hesse and other parts of south-west Germany, for example, where I am familiar with the situation, all mortgages are owned by Jews and whoever wants to buy agrarian supplies finds Jews at every market.  That is how, to common people, the ills of capitalism always appear in the guise of the Jew and it is only natural that these classes, unaccustomed to brooding over the capitalist system, draw from their actual, real life experiences and fall victim to anti-Semitism. “ At the same time, small businesses face strong competition from Jewish corporations: clothing-...

Ult Neoconservatism  Ult Neoconservatism is an ideology that's influenced by Globalization , Coastal Intellectualism , bourgeois without a homeland influenced ideology that is noticeably appealing in the United States. Early history Ult  neoconservatism born out of the Northeast  Academic Intelligentsia . Then former Trotskyists who soon grew tired with communism and the left wing overall, due to its anti-Semitism and anti-west sentiment and anti-americanism in the USSR (like following the Great Purge etc) These ult neoconservatives most pressing concern morphed the welfare of Israel, created in 1948 so these multi ethnic, religiously diverse ult neoconservatives could come together against the USSR being their common foe, by uniting the West- the US and Israel as a pre NATO type of alliance to keep the USSR from going after the West, Jews and the US in particular When the 1970s arrived, these ult neocons were leaning deeper and deeper into more of an authoritarian stan...

 rdded  Why did Jesus not overthrow the Roman Empire? That Jesus didn't come to overthrow the Roman Empire is why the Jews rejected Him, but that was NOT His duty or mission to liberate Judea from the Romans  Jesus told the Jews to not fight back against the Roman occupiers. It angers many people, but Christians are taught to not physically fight our oppressors whether its an idolatrous emperor or a slave master As He told Pilate, “my kingdom is not of this world”. Meaning He was not sent to overthrow the Roman Empire. The jews wanted the messiah to be another kind of Maccabean revolutionary. What they wanted mirrors what a lot of christians nowadays want. They wanted the messiah to come and show everyone that the Jews were the chosen people, while the Jews stood in the background and flipped the romans the bird and said “boy don’t you wish you would have listened to us when you all had the chance” It’s mirrored in Jonah’s attitude towards Nineveh, after he’s done ministe...

 A lot of the early Zionists were said to to be Socialists. The USSR was one of the first countries to recognize Israel as a country, Israel won the 1948 war against the Arabs in large part due to arms shipments that came from Communist Czechoslovakia, many of the early kibbutzim were proto Socialist communities(Noam Chomsky worked on one), David Ben Gurion (founding father of Israel) was the leader of ‘Mapai’ the ‘Workers Party’ which is a Democratic Socialist organization. A lot of the Old Left was pro Israel as a result. There was enormous sympathy for the new Jewish state because of the WWII, also in 1948 Israel looked like the more progressive option compared to the feudal Arab regimes which surrounded Israel. A party that rules Israel with the Liberal, national democratic values mentioned here held by the protesters  with a touch of Le ft Wing Z ioni sm   A left wing Israeli government that is like Israel's version of the Left Anarchist state of Rojava (see here , h...

 I also love the "Be gay, do crime" slogan.  That slogan is anti neoliberal and anti authoritarian and it implies that gays doing criminal and incivil acts may be necessary to obtain equal rights for gays everywhere (since being gay is still criminalized in many places around the world)   Queer Anarchists can trace this type of bold method back to the Stonewall riots where gay protestors back then used the same methods to try to obtain equal rights for gays

 The revolution is aimed at new arrangements, while the insurrection leads us to no longer let ourselves be arranged. It instead seeks to arrange ourselves, and set no radiant hopes on any institutions. Permanent revolutions are good because they change things in a manner where revoltions don’t take people by surprise since they are ongoing.  It is not a fight versus the establishment, since, if this prospers, the establishment would collapse of itself.  It is only a working of a person’s way out of the establishment. If they leave the establishment, it is dead and falls into decay. Since now their aim would not be the overthrow of the established order but their rising up above it, their intention and action would not be a political or social intention and action, but, since they are directed really toward themselves and their ownness, an egoistic intention and action The revolution demands that a person makes arrangements; the insurrection demands that a person stand or...

 I believe that the New England states should have seceded from the Union during the War of 1812 thus forming their own county and helped or took over for the British in that war against the US. Once that happened and New England won the War of 1812 vs the US (and Britain left the US),   I'd want New England to force the South, Midwest, West and non New England Northeast US to be as liberal as New England. It's just that I feel that the US wasn't doing enough to help New England during that war and that New England could have had an opening in seceding and defeating the US to spread liberal New England puritan values throughout the US to make the US more liberal decades earlier and be ahead of the curve hence my support for a 1812 New England secession from the Union and them forming their own country. I support the United States breaking free of British rule in the 1770s, and fighting for and gaining their independence from Britain. I support the formation of the United ...

 

  American model Likes   George Washington   Abraham   Lincoln   Guns   Freedom & Liberty   (Self-proclaimed)   Liberal Democracy   Manifest Destiny   NATO   Military Interventions

  Burdenist Hannah Ardent approved (alter) Chauvinism / LOM Lef t W i ng Ch auv i n i sm  (not unlike    Western Chauvinist Leftism [7] ) A subaltern view - Frontline - The Hindu The Hindu https://frontline.thehindu.com  › Books Aug 7, 2013 —  He calls this “ statist chauvinism ”. Pandey's close reading of the available sources is a useful lesson in research methodology as he sifts ...

 Cultural invisible coup (NON  literal coup /NON violent) means a legally and democratically elected head of state makes such radical and extreme changes (but popular with about most or near most of the country) to the country after taking over as head of state it feels like a coup due to these new radical extreme cultural policies causing such changes in our country it feels like our country is one we no longer recognize 

When Whites are no longer in the majority, racism will fade and the US will never be a White country again These Census figures appear to validate a typical assumption: That the US is heading forward to become a rainbow nation around the mid 2040s, when Whites are predicted to become a minority. So the dewhitening of the US will lead to the erosion of anti blackness, ethnic/racial chauvinism, white supremacy etc This reddit thread  backs me up here and refutes counter arguments listed in its OP

Left wing NrX  + Curtis Yarvin  Progressive  +  Liberal 2.0 version  of Post Liberalism (where Post Liberalism is left of Liberalism 2.0 and not right of it)

American Political Theory  +  Fourth Political Theory   Good Cop Bad Cop routine  + proto Liberalism 2.0 that will be in the Fifth Political theory

Radical Black power alternatively known as Black activism against anti blackness, and against 'white supremacy'

 The anti colonialist, good 'ethno' nationalism that the Democratic Socialists of America supports here  and the good type of 'ethno' nationalism that this article supports

1 Usually I don't answer top level questions here as a communist, but I think it might make sense to here. I respect Dr. West immensely and have a lot in common with his politics. But I can't wrap my head around how this candidacy is a viable political strategy. The only thing that makes sense to me is that West, like Ralph Nader, is consciously trying to pressure the Democratic Party to move to the left. This was Nader's conscious motivation when he ran third party. And I don't mind that tactic, but imho it would seem much more effective to work on winning elections with a third party locally, like what Kshama Sawant is doing with Socialist Alternative and Workers Strike Back. The whole point of being a leftist is the recognition that collective struggle is the way we win and build power. I'm really hoping this candidacy is coming from that mindset, because it doesn't look like it from here. The only thing that makes sense to me is that West, like Ralph Nader, ...

I fully agree with everything that Emma Vigeland said in the videos below as her views in these views are the same views I have on trans people and transwomen in sports to a tee: Anyone who criticizes Emma's views in the above videos is a transphobic pig