Zeegn dfofdidf

Liberal 1.0 ideology (I)

Organicist Liberalism 

(One Nation) Labour Aristocracy , *Indo European Egalitarian Aristocracy and Post Aristocracy/ Positive Bull Moose Jingoist-International Aristocracy

Left Wing Corporatism mixed with Left Wing version of Right Syndicalism (which has elements of Socialism and Left Wing Populism)

Dirigisme

Humanism

Organic Democracy

Patriotism for Native American reservations and pre colonized Indigenous America

Indigenous Revived America Revivalist  (believes Native American lands returned to them while the colonizers in the US move to Europe/Australia)

Moderate Nationalist for bodily autonomy and self government

World Federalism

Liberal 1.0 ideology (II)

Conservative Neoliberalism

State Capitalism that acts like a Auth Left form of Authoritarian Capitalism (Dmitry Medvedev variant) 

Invented Traditionalism

Pro Democracy 

Liberalism 1.0 also includes:

Arab spring liberal ideology (including anti colonialism, and pro Democracy for Muslim countries) who put Mohammed Morsi into power

Is fiscal center conservative to Tea Party fiscal, statist (but mostly democratic) civically variable and culturally soft center left to solidly right ideology

It supports a union of fiscal ideas that are typical of liberalism (like pro-free enterprise capitalist market economy, like Classical Liberal essentially but more times than not it is Keynesian, and supports a Ordoliberal Social market economy) with Left Wing Nrx along with Post Left Anarchism and  Pan-meta,  post ethno,  value pluralism 

It believes that there should be a separation between some vague form of Capitalist Communism/crony Command economy/ethereum economy and bourgeois neoliberal Democracy

It also supports this post Liberalism ideology like on sociofinancial outlooks as it sees Liberalism 2.0 as decadent


notes


from Mises :*The uniqueness of the Indo-European egalitarian aristocracy was the freedom (and even encouragement) of individuals to strive for personal recognition – a Nietzschean "restless ethos" in which berserkers flaunted their fearlessness in combat to earn respect and nobility.9 The aristocracy (from the Greek for excellent or virtuous being – "aristos") were thus the nobles of a society whose virtues were martial and masculine, evidenced by the brotherhoods/war-bands of free men. The individualistic nature of these "free aristocrats" was not that of ‘an autocrat who treats the upper classes as unequal servants but as “peers” who exist in a spirit of equality as warriors of noble birth.’10





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Qoeioew09w0

 I also love the "Be gay, do crime" slogan.  That slogan is anti neoliberal and anti authoritarian and it implies that gays doing criminal and incivil acts may be necessary to obtain equal rights for gays everywhere (since being gay is still criminalized in many places around the world)   Queer Anarchists can trace this type of bold method back to the Stonewall riots where gay protestors back then used the same methods to try to obtain equal rights for gays
Read more

Party on outside

1 Usually I don't answer top level questions here as a communist, but I think it might make sense to here. I respect Dr. West immensely and have a lot in common with his politics. But I can't wrap my head around how this candidacy is a viable political strategy. The only thing that makes sense to me is that West, like Ralph Nader, is consciously trying to pressure the Democratic Party to move to the left. This was Nader's conscious motivation when he ran third party. And I don't mind that tactic, but imho it would seem much more effective to work on winning elections with a third party locally, like what Kshama Sawant is doing with Socialist Alternative and Workers Strike Back. The whole point of being a leftist is the recognition that collective struggle is the way we win and build power. I'm really hoping this candidacy is coming from that mindset, because it doesn't look like it from here. The only thing that makes sense to me is that West, like Ralph Nader,
Read more

Exh dfie9er09er

Image
Ult Neoconservatism  Ult Neoconservatism is an ideology that's influenced by Globalization , Coastal Intellectualism , bourgeois without a homeland influenced ideology that is noticeably appealing in the United States. Early history Ult  neoconservatism born out of the Northeast  Academic Intelligentsia . Then former Trotskyists who soon grew tired with communism and the left wing overall, due to its anti-Semitism and anti-west sentiment and anti-americanism in the USSR (like following the Great Purge etc) These ult neoconservatives most pressing concern morphed the welfare of Israel, created in 1948 so these multi ethnic, religiously diverse ult neoconservatives could come together against the USSR being their common foe, by uniting the West- the US and Israel as a pre NATO type of alliance to keep the USSR from going after the West, Jews and the US in particular When the 1970s arrived, these ult neocons were leaning deeper and deeper into more of an authoritarian stance in thei
Read more