Zeegn dfofdidf

Liberal 1.0 ideology (I)

Organicist Liberalism 

(One Nation) Labour Aristocracy , *Indo European Egalitarian Aristocracy and Post Aristocracy/ Positive Bull Moose Jingoist-International Aristocracy

Left Wing Corporatism mixed with Left Wing version of Right Syndicalism (which has elements of Socialism and Left Wing Populism)

Dirigisme

Humanism

Organic Democracy

Patriotism for Native American reservations and pre colonized Indigenous America

Indigenous Revived America Revivalist  (believes Native American lands returned to them while the colonizers in the US move to Europe/Australia)

Moderate Nationalist for bodily autonomy and self government

World Federalism

Liberal 1.0 ideology (II)

Conservative Neoliberalism

State Capitalism that acts like a Auth Left form of Authoritarian Capitalism (Dmitry Medvedev variant) 

Invented Traditionalism

Pro Democracy 

Liberalism 1.0 also includes:

Arab spring liberal ideology (including anti colonialism, and pro Democracy for Muslim countries) who put Mohammed Morsi into power

Is fiscal center conservative to Tea Party fiscal, statist (but mostly democratic) civically variable and culturally soft center left to solidly right ideology

It supports a union of fiscal ideas that are typical of liberalism (like pro-free enterprise capitalist market economy, like Classical Liberal essentially but more times than not it is Keynesian, and supports a Ordoliberal Social market economy) with Left Wing Nrx along with Post Left Anarchism and  Pan-meta,  post ethno,  value pluralism 

It believes that there should be a separation between some vague form of Capitalist Communism/crony Command economy/ethereum economy and bourgeois neoliberal Democracy

It also supports this post Liberalism ideology like on sociofinancial outlooks as it sees Liberalism 2.0 as decadent

notes

from Mises :*The uniqueness of the Indo-European egalitarian aristocracy was the freedom (and even encouragement) of individuals to strive for personal recognition – a Nietzschean "restless ethos" in which berserkers flaunted their fearlessness in combat to earn respect and nobility.9 The aristocracy (from the Greek for excellent or virtuous being – "aristos") were thus the nobles of a society whose virtues were martial and masculine, evidenced by the brotherhoods/war-bands of free men. The individualistic nature of these "free aristocrats" was not that of ‘an autocrat who treats the upper classes as unequal servants but as “peers” who exist in a spirit of equality as warriors of noble birth.’10